🌸 万物焕新春季特惠 年度计划立减 30% 🌸 优惠码：SPRING2026
Break down the core argument of this document
Prompt detail
Please analyze the selected document {{@document}} and answer:
1. What is the main claim or conclusion?
2. What assumptions does this argument rely on?
3. What evidence is used to support it?
4. Which parts are speculative, and which parts are well-supported?
Only use information from the selected document.
If any part is unclear or unsupported, explicitly point it out.
What the prompt does
When reviewing reports, proposals, or strategic documents, it's often hard to separate solid evidence from assumptions and speculation. This prompt asks remio to dissect a specific document into its core argumentative components — identifying the main claim, underlying assumptions, supporting evidence, and speculative reasoning.
You select a document stored in remio, and it returns a structured critical analysis. The output clearly labels what's well-supported versus what lacks evidence, so your team can make informed decisions without re-reading the entire document line by line.
When to use
• Reviewing a vendor's proposal before signing a contract to identify unsupported performance claims
• Preparing for a board meeting where you need to challenge or defend a strategic recommendation
• Evaluating a competitor analysis report to determine which market predictions are evidence-based versus speculative
• Auditing an internal business case document before allocating budget to a new initiative
• Fact-checking a research summary shared by a teammate to ensure conclusions match the cited data
Prompt examples
Input: Please analyze the selected document {{@Q3 Market Expansion Proposal - APAC Region}} and answer:
1. What is the main claim or conclusion?
2. What assumptions does this argument rely on?
3. What evidence is used to support it?
4. Which parts are speculative, and which parts are well-supported?
remio responds:
The main claim is that expanding into Southeast Asia by Q1 next year will generate $2.4M in new ARR within 12 months. The argument relies on three key assumptions: that current enterprise pipeline conversion rates (18%) will hold in a new market, that local regulatory approvals will be completed within 90 days, and that the Singapore office can be staffed with 8 senior hires by December. Evidence cited includes Gartner's 2024 APAC SaaS growth report and three signed LOIs from regional prospects. The 90-day regulatory timeline is speculative — no regulatory consultation is referenced. The $2.4M ARR projection is partially supported by the LOIs but extrapolates heavily from a small sample size.
Tip 1:
Choose documents with a clear argumentative structure — proposals, business cases, and strategy memos yield the most detailed breakdowns compared to raw data files.
Tip 2:
After receiving the analysis, follow up by asking remio to locate related documents that could fill gaps in the unsupported sections.
Tip 3:
For lengthy documents, narrow the scope by specifying a particular section or claim you want analyzed to get sharper, more actionable results.
More tips
remio满足您对知识的所有需求
了解更多功能
从网站、本地文件夹和文件中获取资源。
从您的整个知识库中获取即时、可靠的答案。
您的工作助手，可在台式机、浏览器和移动设备上使用。
无限次免费录音和转录，非机器人操作。