🌸 スプリングセール：年間プラン30%オフ 🌸 コード：SPRING2026
Evaluate the robustness of a specific conclusion
Prompt detail
Focus on the following conclusion extracted from the selected document:
{{conclusion}}
##Document: {{@document}}
Please evaluate:
- What evidence directly supports this conclusion?
- What assumptions or methodological choices does it depend on?
- Under what conditions might this conclusion not hold?
Be explicit about uncertainty and limitations.
What the prompt does
When a document presents a bold conclusion, it's easy to accept it at face value. This prompt helps you critically examine whether a specific conclusion is well-supported by asking remio to identify the direct evidence, uncover hidden assumptions, and surface conditions where the conclusion might break down.
You provide a conclusion and point remio to the source document. remio then returns a structured evaluation — listing supporting evidence, methodological dependencies, and uncertainty factors — so your team can make informed decisions rather than relying on unexamined claims.
When to use
• Reviewing a market research report before presenting its findings to leadership and needing to verify the strength of key claims.
• Assessing a vendor's ROI projections in a proposal to determine if their assumptions are realistic for your business context.
• Preparing for a strategy meeting where a competitor analysis concludes your market share is declining, and you need to stress-test that claim.
• Auditing an internal post-mortem that attributes a project failure to a single root cause.
• Vetting a consultant's deliverable before sharing recommendations with stakeholders.
Prompt examples
Input:
Conclusion: "Expanding into the APAC market will generate $4.2M in incremental revenue within 18 months."
Document: @Q3 APAC Market Expansion Feasibility Study
remio responds:
The $4.2M projection is directly supported by three data points in the document: current customer interest surveys (Section 3.2), comparable revenue from the EMEA expansion in 2022, and partner channel estimates from two regional distributors. However, the conclusion assumes a 60-day regulatory approval timeline in Singapore and Japan, which the document acknowledges has historically averaged 90-120 days. It also depends on the assumption that EMEA expansion patterns are transferable to APAC markets despite significant differences in buying cycles. This conclusion would not hold if the USD/SGD exchange rate shifts beyond the 3% variance modeled, or if the planned Q1 hiring of six regional sales reps is delayed. The confidence interval around the $4.2M figure should be treated as moderate at best.
Tip 1:
Copy the exact conclusion text from the document rather than paraphrasing — this helps remio locate the precise supporting evidence and surrounding context more accurately.
Tip 2:
After receiving the evaluation, follow up by asking remio to find contradicting evidence in other documents your team has produced on the same topic.
Tip 3:
Specify the decision you're trying to make so remio can weight its analysis toward the most relevant assumptions and risks.
More tips
レミオは知識に関するあらゆるニーズを満たします
詳しい機能はこちら
ウェブサイト、ローカル フォルダー、ファイルからリソースをキャプチャします。
ナレッジベース全体から、信頼できる回答を即座に取得できます。
デスクトップ、ブラウザ、モバイルで使えるアシスタント。
無制限の無料録音と文字起こし、ボットなし。